Supervivencia de la ciclosporina en el tratamiento de la dermatitis atópica moderada-grave: Registro Español de Dermatitis Atópica (BIOBADATOP) / Drug Survival in Cyclosporine Treatment for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of the Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry (BIOBADATOP)

Antecedentes: Debido a la eclosión en el último quinquenio de nuevas alternativas terapéuticas para la dermatitis atópica (DA), nos planteamos estudiar la supervivencia actual de la ciclosporina (CsA) en esta patología. La CsA, como paso necesario solicitado por el Sistema Nacional de Salud de España para la autorización de otros tratamientos sistémicos, podría presentar una supervivencia menor que en otras enfermedades. Material y método: Estudio multicéntrico, observacional, de cohortes prospectivo para el que se recogieron pacientes incluidos en el Registro Español de Dermatitis Atópica (BIOBADATOP). Como cohorte de comparación se emplearon los datos del Registro Español de tratamientos sistémicos en Psoriasis (BIOBADADERM). Resultados: Se incluyeron 130 pacientes diagnosticados de DA que habían recibido CsA (mediana de supervivencia de CsA: 1 año). En el grupo comparador se incluyeron 150 pacientes psoriásicos que habían recibido CsA (mediana de supervivencia: 0,37 años). Observamos una mayor supervivencia de la CsA en los pacientes con DA en comparación con los pacientes psoriásicos (p<0,001). Conclusión: La supervivencia de la CsA en BIOBADATOP es similar a la descrita en otras series de pacientes con DA, y superior a la observada en los pacientes con psoriasis en el registro BIOBADADERM.(AU)

Background: The past 5 years have seen a proliferation of new treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD). We analyzed recent drug survival data for cyclosporine in this setting. Because the Spanish National Healthcare system requires patients with AD to be treated with cyclosporine before they can be prescribed other systemic treatments, drug survival for cyclosporine may be shorter than in other diseases. Material and method: Multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study using data from the Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry (BIOBADATOP). Data from the Spanish Registry of Systemic Treatments in Psoriasis (BIOBADADERM) were used to create a comparison cohort. Results: We analyzed data for 130 patients with AD treated with cyclosporine (median drug survival, 1 year). Median cyclosporine survival in the psoriasis comparison group (150 patients) was 0.37 years. Drug survival was significantly longer in AD than in psoriasis (P<.001). Conclusion: Drug survival of cyclosporine in the BIOBADATOP registry is similar to that described in other series of patients with AD and longer than that observed in the BIOBADADERM psoriasis registry.(AU)

[Translated article] Drug Survival in Cyclosporine Treatment for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of the Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry (BIOBADATOP) / Supervivencia de la ciclosporina en el tratamiento de la dermatitis atópica moderada-grave: Registro Español de Dermatitis Atópica (BIOBADATOP)

Antecedentes: Debido a la eclosión en el último quinquenio de nuevas alternativas terapéuticas para la dermatitis atópica (DA), nos planteamos estudiar la supervivencia actual de la ciclosporina (CsA) en esta patología. La CsA, como paso necesario solicitado por el Sistema Nacional de Salud de España para la autorización de otros tratamientos sistémicos, podría presentar una supervivencia menor que en otras enfermedades. Material y método: Estudio multicéntrico, observacional, de cohortes prospectivo para el que se recogieron pacientes incluidos en el Registro Español de Dermatitis Atópica (BIOBADATOP). Como cohorte de comparación se emplearon los datos del Registro Español de tratamientos sistémicos en Psoriasis (BIOBADADERM). Resultados: Se incluyeron 130 pacientes diagnosticados de DA que habían recibido CsA (mediana de supervivencia de CsA: 1 año). En el grupo comparador se incluyeron 150 pacientes psoriásicos que habían recibido CsA (mediana de supervivencia: 0,37 años). Observamos una mayor supervivencia de la CsA en los pacientes con DA en comparación con los pacientes psoriásicos (p<0,001). Conclusión: La supervivencia de la CsA en BIOBADATOP es similar a la descrita en otras series de pacientes con DA, y superior a la observada en los pacientes con psoriasis en el registro BIOBADADERM.(AU)

Background: The past 5 years have seen a proliferation of new treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD). We analyzed recent drug survival data for cyclosporine in this setting. Because the Spanish National Healthcare system requires patients with AD to be treated with cyclosporine before they can be prescribed other systemic treatments, drug survival for cyclosporine may be shorter than in other diseases. Material and method: Multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study using data from the Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry (BIOBADATOP). Data from the Spanish Registry of Systemic Treatments in Psoriasis (BIOBADADERM) were used to create a comparison cohort. Results: We analyzed data for 130 patients with AD treated with cyclosporine (median drug survival, 1 year). Median cyclosporine survival in the psoriasis comparison group (150 patients) was 0.37 years. Drug survival was significantly longer in AD than in psoriasis (P<.001). Conclusion: Drug survival of cyclosporine in the BIOBADATOP registry is similar to that described in other series of patients with AD and longer than that observed in the BIOBADADERM psoriasis registry.(AU)

[Translated article] Drug Survival in Cyclosporine Treatment for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of the Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry (BIOBADATOP).

BACKGROUND: The past 5 years have seen a proliferation of new treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD). We analyzed recent drug survival data for cyclosporine in this setting. Because the Spanish National Healthcare system requires patients with AD to be treated with cyclosporine before they can be prescribed other systemic treatments, drug survival for cyclosporine may be shorter than in other diseases. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study using data from the Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry (BIOBADATOP). Data from the Spanish Registry of Systemic Treatments in Psoriasis (BIOBADADERM) were used to create a comparison cohort. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 130 patients with AD treated with cyclosporine (median drug survival, 1 year). Median cyclosporine survival in the psoriasis comparison group (150 patients) was 0.37 years. Drug survival was significantly longer in AD than in psoriasis (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Drug survival of cyclosporine in the BIOBADATOP registry is similar to that described in other series of patients with AD and longer than that observed in the BIOBADADERM psoriasis registry.

Drug Survival in Cyclosporine Treatment for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of the Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry (BIOBADATOP). / Supervivencia de la ciclosporina en el tratamiento de la dermatitis atópica moderada-grave: Registro Español de Dermatitis Atópica (BIOBADATOP).

BACKGROUND: The past 5 years have seen a proliferation of new treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD). We analyzed recent drug survival data for cyclosporine in this setting. Because the Spanish National Healthcare system requires patients with AD to be treated with cyclosporine before they can be prescribed other systemic treatments, drug survival for cyclosporine may be shorter than in other diseases. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study using data from the Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry (BIOBADATOP). Data from the Spanish Registry of Systemic Treatments in Psoriasis (BIOBADADERM) were used to create a comparison cohort. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 130 patients with AD treated with cyclosporine (median drug survival, 1 year). Median cyclosporine survival in the psoriasis comparison group (150 patients) was 0.37 years. Drug survival was significantly longer in AD than in psoriasis (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Drug survival of cyclosporine in the BIOBADATOP registry is similar to that described in other series of patients with AD and longer than that observed in the BIOBADADERM psoriasis registry.

BIOBADATOP: Registro Español de Dermatitis Atópica. Descripción y primeros resultados / BIOBADATOP Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry: Description and Early Findings

Antecedentes En los últimos años se ha producido una revolución en el conocimiento de la dermatitis atópica (DA) que ha revertido en un salto cualitativo en las expectativas terapéuticas. En este contexto, resulta fundamental disponer de datos de práctica clínica de calidad. Material y método BIOBADATOP es el Registro Español de Dermatitis Atópica, un estudio observacional, prospectivo y multicéntrico, con una cohorte de pacientes de cualquier edad con DA que requieren el empleo de tratamiento sistémico (convencional o innovador). Se registraron los datos demográficos, de diagnóstico, los tratamientos y los acontecimientos adversos (AA). Resultados Se incluyeron 258 pacientes, con 347 tratamientos sistémicos iniciados para la DA. Se suspendieron el 29,4% de los tratamientos, principalmente por falta de eficacia (10,7%). Durante el período de seguimiento se registraron 132AA. Del total, el 65% (86) relacionaron con el tratamiento sistémico iniciado, siendo los más frecuentes dupilumab (39AA) y ciclosporina (38AA). Los AA más frecuentes fueron: conjuntivitis (11pacientes), cefalea (6), hipertricosis (5) y náuseas (4). Se registró un AA grave (mastoiditis aguda) relacionado con ciclosporina. Conclusiones En este primer informe, la descripción de AA está limitada por los cortos períodos de seguimiento, que no permiten el cálculo de tasas de incidencias crudas ni ajustadas y no se han realizado comparaciones. Hasta la fecha del análisis no se han registrado AA graves en relación a las nuevas terapias. BIOBADATOP permitirá generar conocimiento en términos de efectividad y seguridad de los tratamientos sistémicos clásicos y las nuevas terapias en DA (AU)

Background In recent years, remarkable improvements in our understanding of atopic dermatitis (AD) have revolutionized treatment perspectives, but access to reliable data from clinical practice is essential. Materials and method The Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry, BIOBADATOP, is a prospective, multicenter database that collects information on patients of all ages with AD requiring systemic therapy with conventional or novel drugs. We analyzed the registry to describe patient characteristics, diagnoses, treatments, and adverse events (AEs). Results We studied data entries for 258 patients who had received 347 systemic treatments for AD. Treatment was discontinued in 29.4% of cases, mostly due to a lack of effectiveness (in 10.7% of cases). A total of 132 AEs were described during follow-up. Eighty-six AEs (65%) were linked to a systemic treatment, most commonly dupilumab (39AEs) and cyclosporine (38AEs). The most common AEs were conjunctivitis (11patients), headache (6), hypertrichosis (5), and nausea (4). There was 1severe AE (acute mastoiditis) associated with cyclosporine. Conclusions Initial findings on AEs from the Spanish BIOBADATOP registry are limited by short follow-up times precluding comparisons or calculation of crude and adjusted incidence rates. At the time of our analysis, no severe AEs had been reported for novel systemic therapies. BIOBADATOP will help answer questions on the effectiveness and safety of conventional and novel systemic therapies in AD (AU)

[Translated article] BIOBADATOP Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry: Description and Early Findings / BIOBADATOP: Registro Español de Dermatitis Atópica. Descripción y primeros resultados

Background In recent years, remarkable improvements in our understanding of atopic dermatitis (AD) have revolutionized treatment perspectives, but access to reliable data from clinical practice is essential. Materials and method The Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry, BIOBADATOP, is a prospective, multicenter database that collects information on patients of all ages with AD requiring systemic therapy with conventional or novel drugs. We analyzed the registry to describe patient characteristics, diagnoses, treatments, and adverse events (AEs). Results We studied data entries for 258 patients who had received 347 systemic treatments for AD. Treatment was discontinued in 29.4% of cases, mostly due to a lack of effectiveness (in 10.7% of cases). A total of 132 AEs were described during follow-up. Eighty-six AEs (65%) were linked to a systemic treatment, most commonly dupilumab (39AEs) and cyclosporine (38AEs). The most common AEs were conjunctivitis (11patients), headache (6), hypertrichosis (5), and nausea (4). There was 1severe AE (acute mastoiditis) associated with cyclosporine. Conclusions Initial findings on AEs from the Spanish BIOBADATOP registry are limited by short follow-up times precluding comparisons or calculation of crude and adjusted incidence rates. At the time of our analysis, no severe AEs had been reported for novel systemic therapies. BIOBADATOP will help answer questions on the effectiveness and safety of conventional and novel systemic therapies in AD (AU)

Antecedentes En los últimos años se ha producido una revolución en el conocimiento de la dermatitis atópica (DA) que ha revertido en un salto cualitativo en las expectativas terapéuticas. En este contexto, resulta fundamental disponer de datos de práctica clínica de calidad. Material y método BIOBADATOP es el Registro Español de Dermatitis Atópica, un estudio observacional, prospectivo y multicéntrico, con una cohorte de pacientes de cualquier edad con DA que requieren el empleo de tratamiento sistémico (convencional o innovador). Se registraron los datos demográficos, de diagnóstico, los tratamientos y los acontecimientos adversos (AA). Resultados Se incluyeron 258 pacientes, con 347 tratamientos sistémicos iniciados para la DA. Se suspendieron el 29,4% de los tratamientos, principalmente por falta de eficacia (10,7%). Durante el período de seguimiento se registraron 132AA. Del total, el 65% (86) relacionaron con el tratamiento sistémico iniciado, siendo los más frecuentes dupilumab (39AA) y ciclosporina (38AA). Los AA más frecuentes fueron: conjuntivitis (11pacientes), cefalea (6), hipertricosis (5) y náuseas (4). Se registró un AA grave (mastoiditis aguda) relacionado con ciclosporina. Conclusiones En este primer informe, la descripción de AA está limitada por los cortos períodos de seguimiento, que no permiten el cálculo de tasas de incidencias crudas ni ajustadas y no se han realizado comparaciones. Hasta la fecha del análisis no se han registrado AA graves en relación a las nuevas terapias. BIOBADATOP permitirá generar conocimiento en términos de efectividad y seguridad de los tratamientos sistémicos clásicos y las nuevas terapias en DA (AU)

BIOBADATOP Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry: Description and Early Findings. / BIOBADATOP: Registro Español de Dermatitis Atópica. Descripción y primeros resultados.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, remarkable improvements in our understanding of atopic dermatitis (AD) have revolutionized treatment perspectives, but access to reliable data from clinical practice is essential. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry, BIOBADATOP, is a prospective, multicenter database that collects information on patients of all ages with AD requiring systemic therapy with conventional or novel drugs. We analyzed the registry to describe patient characteristics, diagnoses, treatments, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: We studied data entries for 258 patients who had received 347 systemic treatments for AD. Treatment was discontinued in 29.4% of cases, mostly due to a lack of effectiveness (in 10.7% of cases). A total of 132 AEs were described during follow-up. Eighty-six AEs (65%) were linked to a systemic treatment, most commonly dupilumab (39AEs) and cyclosporine (38AEs). The most common AEs were conjunctivitis (11patients), headache (6), hypertrichosis (5), and nausea (4). There was 1severe AE (acute mastoiditis) associated with cyclosporine. CONCLUSIONS: Initial findings on AEs from the Spanish BIOBADATOP registry are limited by short follow-up times precluding comparisons or calculation of crude and adjusted incidence rates. At the time of our analysis, no severe AEs had been reported for novel systemic therapies. BIOBADATOP will help answer questions on the effectiveness and safety of conventional and novel systemic therapies in AD.

Seguridad en procedimientos dermatológicos: crisis hipertensiva y arritmias potencialmente malignas / Safety in Dermatologic Procedures: Hypertensive Crises and Potentially Fatal Arrhythmias

Es importante para el cirujano dermatológico, que en muchas ocasiones realiza cirugías prolongadas con el uso exclusivo de anestesia local, conocer el manejo básico de 2complicaciones potencialmente graves: las crisis hipertensivas y las arritmias intraoperatorias. Respecto a las crisis hipertensivas, diferenciamos entre urgencia hipertensiva: elevación importante de la presión arterial (>180/110mm) sin disfunción de órgano diana y urgencia hipertensiva: presión arterial>180/110mmHg con daño progresivo de órgano diana y que requiere de su reducción inmediata. En la primera el objetivo será disminuir esa presión en días y no suele requerir tratamiento urgente, mientras que en la urgencia hipertensiva no se recomienda reducirla excesivamente rápido para evitar daño isquémico en lechos vasculares adaptados a una presión arterial elevada. De elección para el dermatólogo por su perfil de seguridad y sencillez en la urgencia hipertensiva es el captopril. En cuanto a las arritmias: la bradicardia asintomática no precisará de tratamiento, pero siempre comprobaremos que el paciente se encuentra alerta y orientado. En el caso de las taquicardias en las que el paciente esté estable, el siguiente paso sería medir la anchura del complejo QRS y, si esté es ancho, avisar al anestesista. Se recomienda conocer los fármacos disponibles en el quirófano, tenerlos en lugar accesible y elegir los imprescindibles para conocer su uso y dosis. Idealmente, conviene monitorizar y tener preparada la toma de vía periférica en todas las intervenciones en quirófano, así como conocer a todo el personal de quirófano y la localización del especialista en anestesia y reanimación (AU)

As dermatologic surgeons often have to perform long surgeries with local anesthetic only, they should be familiar with the fundamentals of how to manage 2 potentially serious complications: Hypertensive crises and intraoperative arrhythmias. Hypertensive crises can be classified as 1) hypertensive urgencies, characterized by a significant spike in blood pressure (>180/110mmHg) without target-organ dysfunction or 2) hypertensive emergencies, characterized by a blood pressure above 180/110mmHg with progressive target-organ damage. In emergencies, the blood pressure needs to be reduced immediately whereas in urgencies the goal is to reduce it over several days. Care must still be taken not to reduce the blood pressure excessively rapidly in emergencies, however, to avoid ischemic injury to vascular beds that have adapted to a high blood pressure. We recommend that dermatologic surgeons use captopril in hypertensive emergencies because of its safety profile and ease of use. Asymptomatic intraoperative bradycardia does not require treatment, but patients should always be checked to ensure they are alert and responsive. The first step in clinically stable patients with tachycardia is to measure the width of the QRS complex and notify the anesthetist when this is wide. Dermatologic surgeons should also be familiar with the drugs available in the operating room, ensure that they are easily accessible, and identify the most essential ones so they can familiarize themselves with indications and dosage. Patients should be monitored throughout the operation, and material to secure a peripheral intravenous line should be prepared in case of need. Finally, the dermatologic surgeon should know all the staff working in the operating room and be able to locate the specialist in anesthesia and resuscitation (AU)

Estudio de la dosis eritematosa mínima en una serie de urticaria solar / Study of Minimal Erythema Dose in a Series of Solar Urticaria

Antecedentes La dosis eritematosa mínima (DEM) reducida es una reacción anormal a la luz según el fototipo de piel y que se determina mediante fototest. La DEM es reducida o anormal en algunas fotodermatosis. Sin embargo, no hemos encontrado información sobre la DEM reducida en pacientes con urticaria solar (US), enfermedad que cursa con urticaria tras la exposición al sol. Objetivo Determinar la DEM en una serie de pacientes con US. Métodos Llevamos a cabo un estudio prospectivo de casos de US diagnosticados en nuestro departamento entre enero de 2007 y diciembre de 2017, a través de anamnesis o por provocación mediante exposición a la luz solar natural o a fuentes de luz artificial. De acuerdo con el protocolo del Grupo Español de Fotobiología, a las 24 horas se llevó a cabo la lectura del fototest en todos los pacientes. Se recopilaron las variables relativas al paciente (edad, sexo, fototipo), enfermedad (tiempo de evolución, espectro de activación) y otras relacionadas con la posible DEM reducida (autoanticuerpos, medicación fototóxica). Resultados Se estudiaron 25 pacientes, de los cuales, seis (24%) presentaron una DEM anormal, el 83% de ellos eran hombres, y el 50% mostraba el espectro de acción en el rango de la radiación UVB. Conclusión Hasta en una cuarta parte de los pacientes con US se puede observar la DEM anormal. Esta circunstancia podría tener implicaciones en la selección de los pacientes y en los protocolos para el tratamiento con fototerapia (AU)

Background Reduced minimal erythema dose (MED) is an abnormal erythematous reaction to light according to the skin phototype, which is determined by phototest. MED is reduced or abnormal in some photodermatoses. However, we have not found information about reduced MED in patients with solar urticarial (SU), a condition which causes hives after sun exposure. Objective To determine MED in a series of patients with SU. Methods We conducted a prospective study of SU cases diagnosed in our department between January 2007 and December 2017, either by anamnesis, provocation with natural sunlight or provocation with artificial light sources. In all patients, a phototest with reading at 24 h was performed according to the protocol of the Spanish Group of Photobiology. Variables related to the patient (age, sex, phototype), disease (time of evolution, action spectrum) and others related to possible reduced MED (autoantibodies, phototoxic medication) were collected. Results Twenty-five patients were studied. Six patients (24%) had abnormal MED. Eighty-three percent of patients with abnormal MED were men, and 50% had action spectrum in UVB. Conclusion Abnormal MED can be seen in up to a fourth of the patients with SU. This could have implications in the selection of patients and protocols for treatment with phototherapy (AU)

Encefalopatía de Wernicke-escorbuto, ¿una asociación infradiagnosticada? / Scurvy and Wernicke's encephalopathy: An underdiagnosed association?

No disponible

Inducción de fototolerancia con ultravioleta B de banda estrecha en urticaria solar / Induction of Light Tolerance Using Narrowband UV-B in Solar Urticaria

INTRODUCCIÓN: La urticaria solar (US) es una fotodermatosis infrecuente. Los antihistamínicos constituyen la primera línea de tratamiento, incluyéndose en segunda línea la inducción de fototolerancia mediante fototerapia con ultravioleta. OBJETIVOS: Describir y evaluar la eficacia de un protocolo de desensibilización, con UVB de banda estrecha (UVB-BE) en pacientes con US. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes diagnosticados de US con espectro de acción en UVA, luz visible (LV) o ambas, que habían realizado fototerapia con UVB-BE para inducir fototolerancia. Se realizan cursos cortos (menos de 20 sesiones, 3 por semana) durante la primavera, con dosis inicial determinada por el fototipo. Se recogen resultados del Skindex-29 antes del tratamiento y después del verano, y un cuestionario no validado de efectividad terapéutica después del verano para valorar actividad de la enfermedad y grado de satisfacción. RESULTADOS: Se incluyen 8 pacientes con espectro de acción: 50% LV y 50% UVA más luz visible. Se realizaron 17 cursos anuales (1-6 cursos por paciente), de 11 a 20 sesiones. La dosis media de UVB-BE por curso fue 7,45J/cm2. Ningún paciente presentó brotes o efectos adversos durante el tratamiento. La respuesta fue satisfactoria en 6 pacientes. En el 78,6% de los tratamientos la mejoría en el Skindex-29 global fue superior al 20%. La mejoría en las subescalas sintomática y funcional fue superior al 20% en el 71% y el 64% respectivamente. CONCLUSIÓN: La inducción de fototolerancia con UVB-BE en la US es un procedimiento seguro y efectivo en un elevado porcentaje de pacientes

INTRODUCTION: Solar urticaria is an uncommon photodermatosis. First-line treatment is with antihistamines; second-line treatment includes induction of light tolerance using UV phototherapy. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe and evaluate the effectiveness of a desensitization protocol with narrowband UV-B in patients with solar urticaria. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients with solar urticaria with an action spectrum in the UV-A range, the visible light range, or both who had received therapy with narrowband UV-B for induction of light tolerance. Short courses of treatment were administered (< 20 sessions, 3 per week) during spring. The initial dose was determined according to the skin type. The Skindex-29 was administered before treatment and after summer; a nonvalidated questionnaire was also administered after summer to evaluate disease activity and satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: We included 8 patients with an action spectrum (4 with visible light and 4 with UVA plus visible light). Seventeen courses (1-6 per patient) were administered per year. The number of sessions per year ranged from 11 to 20. The mean dose of narrowband UV-B per course was 7.45J/cm2. No patients experienced flares or adverse effects during treatment. The response was satisfactory in 6 patients. The improvement in the overall Skindex-29 score was greater than 20% in 78.6% of cases. The improvement in the function and symptoms subscales was over 20% in 71% and 64% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Induction of light tolerance with narrowband UV-B in solar urticaria is safe and effective in a high percentage of patients

Induction of Light Tolerance Using Narrowband UV-B in Solar Urticaria. / Inducción de fototolerancia con ultravioleta B de banda estrecha en urticaria solar.

INTRODUCTION: Solar urticaria is an uncommon photodermatosis. First-line treatment is with antihistamines; second-line treatment includes induction of light tolerance using UV phototherapy. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe and evaluate the effectiveness of a desensitization protocol with narrowband UV-B in patients with solar urticaria. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients with solar urticaria with an action spectrum in the UV-A range, the visible light range, or both who had received therapy with narrowband UV-B for induction of light tolerance. Short courses of treatment were administered (<20 sessions, 3 per week) during spring. The initial dose was determined according to the skin type. The Skindex-29 was administered before treatment and after summer; a nonvalidated questionnaire was also administered after summer to evaluate disease activity and satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: We included 8 patients with an action spectrum (4 with visible light and 4 with UVA plus visible light). Seventeen courses (1-6 per patient) were administered per year. The number of sessions per year ranged from 11 to 20. The mean dose of narrowband UV-B per course was 7.45J/cm2. No patients experienced flares or adverse effects during treatment. The response was satisfactory in 6 patients. The improvement in the overall Skindex-29 score was greater than 20% in 78.6% of cases. The improvement in the function and symptoms subscales was over 20% in 71% and 64% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Induction of light tolerance with narrowband UV-B in solar urticaria is safe and effective in a high percentage of patients.

Consenso multidisciplinar sobre prevención y tratamiento de la tuberculosis en pacientes candidatos a tratamiento biológico. Adaptación al paciente dermatológico / Prevention and treatment of tuberculosis infection in candidates for biologic therapy: A multidisciplinary consensus statement adapted to the dermatology patient

El riesgo de infección por Mycobacterium tuberculosis se halla aumentado en los pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias crónicas y en tratamiento inmunosupresor, en particular con terapia antifactor de necrosis tumoral α. La detección de la infección tuberculosa latente y el tratamiento preventivo dirigido a reducir el riesgo de progresión a tuberculosis activa es obligatoria en este grupo de pacientes. Este documento de consenso multidisciplinar actualiza la opinión de expertos y establece recomendaciones para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la infección tuberculosa latente en estos pacientes, según los conocimientos actuales en terapias biológicas

Patients with chronic inflammatory diseases being treated with immunosuppressive drugs, and with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in particular, have an increased risk of infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Screening for latent tuberculosis infection and preventive therapy to reduce the risk of progression to active tuberculosis are mandatory in this group of patients. This updated multidisciplinary consensus document presents the latest expert opinions on the treatment and prevention of tuberculosis in candidates for biologic therapy and establishes recommendations based on current knowledge relating to the use of biologic agents